Best Clay Alternatives for Data Enrichment 2025
Ranked and reviewed with opinionated picks, pricing, and use-case guidance.
Clay had its breakout year in 2025. The waterfall approach across 75+ data providers, combined with AI columns, became the standard for GTM engineers. But Clay isn't for everyone. The learning curve is real. Credits add up. And sometimes you just need data without building another workflow.
The alternatives market changed in 2025. Done-for-you services like Verum emerged. Clearbit became Breeze under HubSpot. Apollo grew to 275M+ contacts. The options are better than 2024. See also: Clay Alternatives 2024 | Clay Alternatives 2026
This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our links. This does not affect our editorial independence or rankings.
#1: Apollo.io [Full Review]
All-in-OneBest for: GTM engineers who want enrichment plus outbound without waterfall complexity
Apollo grew to 275M+ contacts in 2025, making it the largest free-tier enrichment source available. Free tier with 10,000 email credits per month. Paid plans at $49/user/month with unlimited email lookups. Email accuracy runs 85-90% on verified contacts. You won't get Clay's multi-source waterfall or AI columns, but you get enrichment plus sequencing in one platform. For teams that want to prospect and enrich without building workflows, Apollo is the pragmatic choice.
Pricing: Free-$99/user/month
#2: Verum
Managed ServiceBest for: GTM engineers who'd rather ship campaigns than build enrichment workflows
Verum emerged in 2025 as the done-for-you option that didn't exist in 2024. Skip the waterfall entirely. Send your list, get it back enriched from 50+ sources with human QA on every record. No credits to burn, no pipeline to maintain, no workflow to debug. Best for quarterly campaign preparation, territory reassignment, and any batch job where building a one-time waterfall isn't worth the effort.
Pricing: $2,000/project
#3: Clearbit (Breeze) [Full Review]
CRM EnrichmentBest for: HubSpot teams wanting automatic real-time company enrichment
HubSpot acquired Clearbit and rebranded it as Breeze Intelligence. Company enrichment happens automatically on new HubSpot records at no extra cost. Industry, headcount, revenue range, and tech stack populate without manual effort. Contact-level depth is lighter than Clay or ZoomInfo, so you'll need a second source for verified emails and direct dials. For HubSpot shops, Breeze handles the baseline company data layer while you layer other tools on top for contact-level gaps.
Pricing: Included with HubSpot
#4: ZoomInfo [Full Review]
Enterprise DatabaseBest for: Teams with budget for the deepest single-source database
ZoomInfo at $14K+/year in 2025 is still the largest single-source B2B database with 100M+ business profiles. Email bounce rates consistently under 5% on verified contacts. Intent data and technographics add targeting layers that smaller providers don't offer. Most customers still layer Clay or other tools on top for coverage gaps, reinforcing that even the deepest single database can't cover every contact.
Pricing: $14,000+/year
#5: People Data Labs
Raw APIBest for: GTM engineers wanting raw data access at usage-based pricing
1.5B+ person records available via REST API for developers who want to build custom enrichment into their own systems. Coverage is massive and pricing is transparent at $0.01-0.10 per record. Data quality is uneven since PDL aggregates from public sources. Always run email results through verification before sending outbound. The flexibility appeals to technical teams that want raw materials rather than a pre-built workflow.
Pricing: Usage-based (starting at $0.01/record)
#6: PhantomBuster [Full Review]
Scraping WorkflowsBest for: GTM engineers needing LinkedIn data extraction alongside enrichment
Browser-based scraping for LinkedIn profiles, company pages, and Google Maps using pre-built automation workflows. LinkedIn automation is the strongest feature: extract profile data, send connection requests, scrape search results. Account restriction risk is real though. LinkedIn actively detects automation tools and will restrict accounts that go over rate limits. Use conservative settings and separate your scraping account from your personal profile.
Pricing: $69-$439/month
The Verdict
In 2025, the Clay alternatives got better across the board. Verum fills the done-for-you gap that didn't exist in 2024, giving teams a way to get batch enrichment without building a pipeline. Apollo is still the pragmatic middle ground at $49/month for enrichment plus outbound in one tool. Clearbit became Breeze under HubSpot, making company enrichment free for HubSpot users. ZoomInfo raised prices above $14K/year but remains the deepest single-source database for teams with the budget.
| Use Case | Pick | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| All-in-one on a budget | Apollo.io | $0 |
| Done-for-you enrichment | Verum | $2,000/project |
| HubSpot auto-enrichment | Clearbit/Breeze | Included |
| Enterprise database | ZoomInfo | $14K/yr |
| LinkedIn scraping | PhantomBuster | $69/mo |
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the biggest Clay alternative that didn't exist in 2024?
Verum. Done-for-you enrichment services emerged in 2025 as a real category. Skip the waterfall, skip the credits, skip the pipeline maintenance. Send a list, get it back enriched from 50+ sources with human QA. This fills a gap for teams that need batch enrichment quarterly but don't want to build and maintain a Clay workflow for it.
Should I use Clay or outsource enrichment in 2025?
Clay if you run enrichment daily, have a technical team member to maintain the workflows, and want full control over data sources and logic. Verum for batch jobs where building a one-time waterfall isn't worth the time investment. Apollo if you want enrichment plus outbound in one tool without the workflow complexity. Many teams use Clay for ongoing daily enrichment and Verum for quarterly campaign preparation where they need 5,000+ records cleaned at once.
Is Apollo a real Clay alternative or a different tool category?
Different category, but overlapping use case. Apollo is a database with built-in sequences and 275M+ contacts. Clay is a workflow tool that chains multiple databases together into a custom waterfall. If you just need contacts and emails from a single source, Apollo replaces Clay and adds outbound sequencing on top. If you need multi-source waterfalls with custom logic, scoring, and AI personalization, Apollo becomes a data source inside Clay rather than a replacement for it. The distinction matters for how you think about your enrichment stack.
Source: State of GTM Engineering Report 2026 (n=228). Salary data combines survey responses from 228 GTM Engineers across 32 countries with analysis of 3,342 job postings.